Welcome to our Site for MG, Triumph and Austin-Healey Car Information.
MG MGB Technical - 3 or 5 bearing engine
Hi All, Can you give me the pros and cons of the 3 and 5 bearing crank engines please. Thanks. |
s page |
Simon I'm assuming you're talking race engines? David Gathercole always used 3-bearing engines. |
Dave O'Neill2 |
Pro 3 bearing free revving against con rods, availabilty, reliability. Some race engine buiders mofify the 5 to a three main bearing. Personally I would always use a 5 bearing engine. Peter |
Peter Burgess Tuning |
If your going to put one in an MGA, the 3-bearing has the mechanical tach. drive; and you may not need to change the backing plate. |
David Werblow |
Hi Guys, Thanks, No Dave its for a medium fast road MGA. |
s page |
I found the first five main bearing engine I drove to be quite a delight--much smoother than the three main bearing engines I had been used to. For any non-race engine, I prefer the five main bearing engines. Better support of the crankshaft, parts are readily available, and with the proper cam and a modified cylinder head they are quite capable of keeping up on modern roads. When we rebuilt the engine in my daughter's MGB, we used a Burgess econo-tune cylinder head and a slightly improved cam with .020" over pistons. It performs in quite similar manner to my younger daughter's Miata. A larger overbore, say .060", a hotter cam, and one of Peter's Fast Road cylinder heads would offer even greater performance improvements. You need to define what you are looking for in a "medium fast road MGA", so you have some defined goals. But, I suspect that either of the engines will meet your defined specifications and the five main bearing engine, with its smoother operation, is my choice for my MGA. Les |
Les Bengtson |
Simon. If you want a 5 bearing engine then I've got a spare one and I'm after a 3 bearing engine for our Magnette. Andrew |
Andrew McGee |
Not a great deal of difference, there is nothing wrong with a three bearing. I love the three in my '64: fully balanced it revs far more sweetly than the two 5 bearings I tried in my MGB GT (which was a fair bit heavier car). I used to know a man with a 1622 A who said it was faster than any road going B but I proved him wrong in my '64! At Silverstone MG Live last year I was told that every car in the FIA MGB race used a five. I was also told quite a while ago that the factory always used threes in the works cars - even after the 5 became available. My bottom line advice would be use the "right" one for your car - a 3 before Aug '64, and a 5 for cars built after that. For an A that's obviously a 3. John. |
John Prewer |
I have a new set of con rods for the 3 bearing if your interested. |
Ken Harris |
I also prefer the 3 main version, which is a much easier swap into an MGA, FWIW - pretty much just drop it in and drive away. Fitting a 5 main means screwing about with rear engine plates, transmission housings/front covers, tachometers, water pumps etc. The 3 main runs more freely and looks like an MGA engine (see attached photo of one in my 62 coupe). I also prefer them for racing. ![]() |
Bill Spohn |
This thread was discussed between 27/02/2013 and 01/03/2013
MG MGB Technical index
This thread is from the archives. Join the live MG MGB Technical BBS now